Seattle City Councilmember Bruce Harrell

buy frontpage software purchase microsoft works suite cubase 4 cost price of autocad 2000 cheap photoshop buy 2003 ms outlook buy ms office 2013 key buy microsoft office 2003 software discount adobe web premium cs4 buy adobe cs2 suite buy quicken 2009 premier buy windows 7 professional retail buy solidworks license buy ilife 09 australia cheap autocad 2008 lt
discount wordperfect software buy autocad 2011 inventor buy mathcad 11 purchase 2007 microsoft office buy nero reloaded price of microsoft visio 2003 standard adobe acrobat price comparison should i buy photoshop or lightroom buy roxio creator 10 best price adobe cs3 cheap adobe after effects powerpoint 2007 price purchase photoshop 7.0 buy adobe creative suite 4 web premium windows buy windows xp professional software

Apr 17 2009

Open Government: No Closed Door Meetings

Published by at 8:36 pm under Open Government

For the record, I never participated in any four-person meetings that became the subject of recent headlines regarding private budget meetings. Five is the magic number in a nine- member council since, as Councilmember Sam Smith would say, “Five makes policy.” However, I believe establishing a “rolling quorum” by rotating smaller groups below five is unlawful and a breach of public trust. Transparency in government is something that I feel very strongly about. That is why I agreed to Co-Chair the Council’s Special Committee on Open Government. The goal of this committee is to ensure that all City departments implement best practices for open meetings and public-records disclosure. I believe government proceedings should take place in public settings. I do believe the Council does a great job of attempting to conduct its affairs in a transparent manner. Committee and Full Council meetings are conducted in a public setting and are broadcast live on the Seattle Channel 21. Subsequently, the meetings are re-broadcast and citizens can dial up past meetings by going to the Seattle Channel website. I will continue to meet with members of the public to understand where we can make our work more transparent in some of the following ways: (1) using technology to make documents more available and accessible; (2) examining logistics of how we communicate such as meeting times, locations and translation barriers; and, (3) examining best practices for boards, commissions and committees utilized by the City.

Comments Off

Comments are closed at this time.